Vaughn v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Vaughn v. State

367 S.W.3d 677, 2012 WL 2107337, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 790

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Vaughn v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 982 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 12, 2012·No. No. ED 97196·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Demetrius D. Vaughn, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Demetrius D. Vaughn, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Vaughn v. State, 367 S.W.3d 677, 2012 WL 2107337, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 790 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

367 S.W.3d 677 (Vaughn v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.