Vaughn v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Vaughn v. State

336 S.W.3d 180, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 269, 2011 WL 797309

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Vaughn v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 982 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 8, 2011·No. ED 95284·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Darren K. Vaughn (Movant) appeals from the Order issued by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Motion to Vacate Sentence and Re-Sentence Under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.05 or in the Alternative Under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 91.06.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential or precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the trial court’s denial of Movant’s motion, pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Darren K. Vaughn (Movant) appeals from the Order issued by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Motion to Vacate Sentence and Re-Sentence Under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.05 or in the Alternative Under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 91.06.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential or precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the trial court’s denial of Movant’s motion, pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Vaughn v. State, 336 S.W.3d 180, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 269, 2011 WL 797309 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

336 S.W.3d 180 (Vaughn v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.