Vaughn v. State
This text of 144 S.E. 223 (Vaughn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
“Until there has been a judgment finally disposing of the case in the trial court, the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction to pass upon an assignment of error complaining of the striking of a plea of former jeopardy, filed by the accused. Fugatszi v. Tomlinson, 119 Ga. 622 [46 S. E. 831], McElroy v. State, 123 Ga. 546 (51 S. E. 596) and cit.” This ruling is controlling in this case. See Civil Code (1910), § 6138; Hightower v. State, 22 Ga. App. 276 (95 S. E. 873); Head v. Jordan, 33 Ga. App. 170 (125 S. E. 733); Johnson v. Merchants & Farmers Bank, 141 Ga. 721 (81 S. E. 873).
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
144 S.E. 223, 38 Ga. App. 438, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vaughn-v-state-gactapp-1928.