McNeal v. State

76 S.E.2d 640, 88 Ga. App. 333, 1953 Ga. App. LEXIS 1079
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 9, 1953
Docket34643
StatusPublished

This text of 76 S.E.2d 640 (McNeal v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McNeal v. State, 76 S.E.2d 640, 88 Ga. App. 333, 1953 Ga. App. LEXIS 1079 (Ga. Ct. App. 1953).

Opinion

Townsend, J.

1. “ ‘Under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court, the striking of a plea of former jeopardy filed by the accused in a criminal case is not a final judgment within the meaning of . . . [Code of 1933, § 6-701], and a direct bill of exceptions assigning error upon the judgment striking the plea is prematurely brought and must be dismissed. Vaughn v. State, 38 Ga. App. 438 (144 S. E. 223), and cit. See also English v. Rosenkrantz, 150 Ga. 745 (105 S. E. 292) and cit.’ Denmark v. State, 41 Ga. App. 470 (153 S. E. 430); Blackwell v. State, 46 Ga. App. 830 (169 S. E. 507); Hightower v. State, 22 Ga. App. 276 (95 S. E. 873); Giles v. State, 34 Ga. App. 201 (129 S. E. 12); Bazemore v. State, 35 Ga. App. 570 (134 S. E. 335); McElroy v. State, 123 Ga. 546 (51 S. E. 596); Thurmond v. State, 59 Ga. App. 333 (200 S. E. 807).” Moyers v. State, 59 Ga. App. 875 (1) (2 S. E. 2d 517); Davis v. State, 191 Ga. 558 (13 S. E. 2d 351); Robinson v. State, 60 Ga. App. 638 (4 S. E. 2d 721).

2. The motion of the defendant in error to dismiss the bill of exceptions here on the ground that the sole exception, based on the overruling of a plea of former jeopardy, is premature, is hereby sustained, since it does not appear that any final judgment has been entered in the case and there is no exception to such final judgment. However, direction is given that the bill of exceptions here be allowed to be entered on the minutes of the trial court as exceptions pendente lite. See Williams v. State, 60 Ga. App. 636 (4 S. E. 2d 719).

Writ oj error dismissed with direction.

Gardner, P. J., and Carlisle, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davis v. State
13 S.E.2d 351 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
McElroy v. State
51 S.E. 596 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)
English v. Rosenkrantz
105 S.E. 292 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1920)
Hightower v. State
95 S.E. 873 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Giles v. State
129 S.E. 12 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)
Bazemore v. State
134 S.E. 335 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)
Vaughn v. State
144 S.E. 223 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Denmark v. State
153 S.E. 430 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Blackwell v. State
169 S.E. 507 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Thurmond v. State
200 S.E. 807 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)
Moyers v. State
2 S.E.2d 517 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)
Williams v. State
4 S.E.2d 719 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)
Robinson v. State
4 S.E.2d 721 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 S.E.2d 640, 88 Ga. App. 333, 1953 Ga. App. LEXIS 1079, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcneal-v-state-gactapp-1953.