Fugazzi, Lovelace & Co. v. Tomlinson
This text of 46 S.E. 831 (Fugazzi, Lovelace & Co. v. Tomlinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Until there has been in the triaL court a judgment finally dis- ' posing of a case, this court is without jurisdiction to entertain a complaint that error’was committed by the trial judge in striking, on demurrer, portions of the defendant’s answer. Turner v. Camp, 110 Ga. 631; Harvey v. Bowles, 112 Ga. 421; Berryman v. Haden, Id. 752; Ray v. Anderson, 117 Ga. 136.
2. As has heretofore been repeatedly announced, the first grant of a new trial will not be disturbed by this court unless it affirmatively appears that the evidence demanded the verdict returned by the jury.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
46 S.E. 831, 119 Ga. 622, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fugazzi-lovelace-co-v-tomlinson-ga-1904.