Battle v. Hambrick
This text of 83 S.E. 937 (Battle v. Hambrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A plaintiff in attachment demurred to the defendant’s answer to the declaration filed in that proceeding. The court overruled the demurrer. The only ruling-complained of in the bill of exceptions being the overruling of the demurrer to the plea, and no final judgment appear[808]*808ing to have been rendered in the attachment case, this court has no jurisdiction to entertain the writ of error. Continental National Bank v. Folsom, 70 Ga. 728; McLendon v. Western & Atlantic Railroad Co., 85 Ga. 129 (11 S. E. 580); Turner v. Camp, 110 Ga. 631 (36 S. E. 76); United Glass Co. v. McConnell, 110 Ga. 616 (36 S. E. 58); Vaughn v. Milner, 121 Ga. 436 (49 S. E. 287); Fugazsi v. Tomlinson, 119 Ga. 622 (46 S. E. 831).
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
83 S.E. 937, 142 Ga. 807, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/battle-v-hambrick-ga-1914.