Vasquez v. Chemical Exchange Industries Inc.

721 S.W.2d 284, 30 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 51, 1986 Tex. LEXIS 591
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 5, 1986
DocketC-5321
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 721 S.W.2d 284 (Vasquez v. Chemical Exchange Industries Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vasquez v. Chemical Exchange Industries Inc., 721 S.W.2d 284, 30 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 51, 1986 Tex. LEXIS 591 (Tex. 1986).

Opinion

OPINION

RAY, Justice.

This is a personal injury suit in which the trial court granted a default judgment on liability as a discovery sanction and after a hearing on damages awarded judgment to Vasquez. The court of appeals held that Chemical Exchange had received inadequate notice of the damages hearing and reversed the trial court judgment. 709 S.W.2d 257. The facts of this case are *285 accurately set out in the court of appeals’ opinion, with one important exception. The court’s statement that the order granting the Motion for Sanctions, rendering the default judgment and setting a hearing on damages was not signed until November 19, 1984 is incorrect. Id. at 261. The record reflects that the order setting the hearing on damages was signed on August 24, 1984. The only order in the record signed on November 19,1984 does not contain the language quoted by the court of appeals.

Chemical Exchange Industries did not object to the order setting the hearing on damages and thus did not preserve error as to notice. In addition, the record does not reflect that any error in this regard was reversible. Tex.R.App.P. 81.

Therefore, we reverse that part of the court of appeals’ judgment remanding the cause for a new trial on damages and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Louis Cognata v. Down Hole Injection, Inc.
375 S.W.3d 370 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2012)
Buyers Products Co. v. Clark
847 S.W.2d 270 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1992)
Altus Communications, Inc. v. Meltzer & Martin, Inc.
829 S.W.2d 878 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1992)
Long v. McDermott
813 S.W.2d 622 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1991)
McFarland v. Szakalun
809 S.W.2d 760 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1991)
Welex, a Division of Halliburton Co. v. Broom
806 S.W.2d 855 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1991)
Koslow's v. MacKie
796 S.W.2d 700 (Texas Supreme Court, 1990)
Tate v. Commodore County Mutual Insurance Co.
767 S.W.2d 219 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
721 S.W.2d 284, 30 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 51, 1986 Tex. LEXIS 591, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vasquez-v-chemical-exchange-industries-inc-tex-1986.