Vary v. Godfrey

6 Cow. 587
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 1827
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 6 Cow. 587 (Vary v. Godfrey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vary v. Godfrey, 6 Cow. 587 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1827).

Opinion

Curia.

This affidavit does not come within the rule laid down in Taylor v. Hatch, (12 John. Rep. 340.) That applies only to affidavits made before an attorney in a suit pending; not to those preparatory to the commencement of one. The affidavit is not entitled; and the attorney may or may not be retained at the time when the affidavit is made. The rule is thus qualified by the English cases. (Haward v. Nalder, Barnes, 60.) The motion must be denied.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Kindt
98 F. 403 (S.D. Iowa, 1900)
Smith v. Ponath
17 Mo. App. 262 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1885)
Bliss v. Molter
8 Abb. N. Cas. 241 (New York Supreme Court, 1879)
In re Mauer
16 F. Cas. 1162 (D. Nevada, 1878)
Gilmore v. Hempstead
4 How. Pr. 153 (New York Supreme Court, 1849)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Cow. 587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vary-v-godfrey-nysupct-1827.