In re Kindt

S.D. Iowa

In re Kindt

98 F. 403, 1900 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 315

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa

DecidedJanuary 18, 1900

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 98 F. 403 (In re Kindt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Kindt, 98 F. 403, 1900 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 315 (S.D. Iowa 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

SC I RAS, District Judge.

Prom the certificate of the referee it appears that the petition for adjudication and the accompanying schedules were sworn to by the bankrupt before if. D. Ely, a notary public in and for Scott county, Iowa; and, the adjudication in bankruptcy having been entered, one W. AY. Humphrey, a creditor of the bankrupt, appeared in the proceedings and moved to set aside the adjudication on the ground that the notary before whom the affidavits to the petition and schedules were taken was a member of the law firm of Ely & Bush, which firm appeared as the attorneys of record for the bankrupt. The referee refused to set aside the adjudication of bankruptcy entered in the case, holding the objection urged to be not well taken, and thereupon the objecting creditor has brought the question before this court for review.

In the strict equity practice the general rule seems to be that affidavits taken before an attorney of record will be deemed to he defective, but this rule, in the majority of the cases, is held to apply only to attorneys of record; that is, to persons who at the time the affidavit was taken before them then appeared as attorney of record for the litigant in whose interest the affidavit is offered. In the present case it does not appear that when the affidavit to the petition and schedules was taken there were pending in the court any proceedings in which Ely & Bush appeared as attorneys of record for the bankrupt, and as is stated in 1 Enc. PI. & Prac. 831., note:

[404]*404“The rule, however, applies only to affidavits made before an attorney in a suit pending, and not to those preparatory to the commencement of one. Vary v. Godfrey, 6 Cow. 587; Willard v. Judd, 15 Johns. 531; Hallenbaek v. Whitaker, 17 Johns. 2. * * *”

As I gather the facts from the record .certified up, the affidavit to which exception is taken was one which was made to the papers preparatory to the initiation of the proceedings in bankruptcy, and at that time H. D. Ely, the notary, was not an attorney of record for the bankrupt, and he could therefore rightfully administer the oath and certify thereto; and the fact that subsequently he became an attorney of record for the bankrupt would not invalidate his previous action as a notary. The ruling of the referee is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SC I RAS, District Judge.

Prom the certificate of the referee it appears that the petition for adjudication and the accompanying schedules were sworn to by the bankrupt before if. D. Ely, a notary public in and for Scott county, Iowa; and, the adjudication in bankruptcy having been entered, one W. AY. Humphrey, a creditor of the bankrupt, appeared in the proceedings and moved to set aside the adjudication on the ground that the notary before whom the affidavits to the petition and schedules were taken was a member of the law firm of Ely & Bush, which firm appeared as the attorneys of record for the bankrupt. The referee refused to set aside the adjudication of bankruptcy entered in the case, holding the objection urged to be not well taken, and thereupon the objecting creditor has brought the question before this court for review.

In the strict equity practice the general rule seems to be that affidavits taken before an attorney of record will be deemed to he defective, but this rule, in the majority of the cases, is held to apply only to attorneys of record; that is, to persons who at the time the affidavit was taken before them then appeared as attorney of record for the litigant in whose interest the affidavit is offered. In the present case it does not appear that when the affidavit to the petition and schedules was taken there were pending in the court any proceedings in which Ely & Bush appeared as attorneys of record for the bankrupt, and as is stated in 1 Enc. PI. & Prac. 831., note:

[404]*404“The rule, however, applies only to affidavits made before an attorney in a suit pending, and not to those preparatory to the commencement of one. Vary v. Godfrey, 6 Cow. 587; Willard v. Judd, 15 Johns. 531; Hallenbaek v. Whitaker, 17 Johns. 2. * * *”

As I gather the facts from the record .certified up, the affidavit to which exception is taken was one which was made to the papers preparatory to the initiation of the proceedings in bankruptcy, and at that time H. D. Ely, the notary, was not an attorney of record for the bankrupt, and he could therefore rightfully administer the oath and certify thereto; and the fact that subsequently he became an attorney of record for the bankrupt would not invalidate his previous action as a notary. The ruling of the referee is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

98 F. 403, 1900 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kindt-iasd-1900.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack