Taylor v. Hatch

New York Supreme Court

Taylor v. Hatch

12 Johns. 340

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 15, 1815

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 12 Johns. 340 (Taylor v. Hatch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taylor v. Hatch, 12 Johns. 340 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1815).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The practice of the court of K. B. is, not to allow an affidavit taken before the attorney in the cause to' be read. It is a very fit and proper rule, which we shall, therefore, adopt as the practice here. As the party may, however, have been led into a mistake as to the practice, we give him leave to withdraw his motion, and to renew it again, at, the next term, on a proper affidavit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The practice of the court of K. B. is, not to allow an affidavit taken before the attorney in the cause to' be read. It is a very fit and proper rule, which we shall, therefore, adopt as the practice here. As the party may, however, have been led into a mistake as to the practice, we give him leave to withdraw his motion, and to renew it again, at, the next term, on a proper affidavit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 Johns. 340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-hatch-nysupct-1815.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack