Vanover v. State

946 So. 2d 1152, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 21277, 2006 WL 3733105
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 20, 2006
DocketNo. 4D06-4154
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 946 So. 2d 1152 (Vanover v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vanover v. State, 946 So. 2d 1152, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 21277, 2006 WL 3733105 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James R. Vanover appeals from an order denying his “Notice of Inquiry,” in which he requested copies of his plea and sentencing transcripts free of charge, so that he may make a collateral challenge under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We treat this appeal as a petition for writ of mandamus and deny the petition. See Golden v. State, 870 So.2d 167, 167 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)(“Beyond the record provided for a direct appeal, [a prisoner] is not entitled to free transcripts to assist in the preparation of either a post-conviction motion or a petition for extraordinary relief.”).

STONE, POLEN and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Milner v. State
196 So. 3d 569 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Pacheco v. State
75 So. 3d 769 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Sanders v. State
62 So. 3d 1176 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Meader v. State
59 So. 3d 1207 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
State v. Kelly
946 So. 2d 1152 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
946 So. 2d 1152, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 21277, 2006 WL 3733105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vanover-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.