Sanders v. State

62 So. 3d 1176, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8068, 2011 WL 2135652
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 1, 2011·No. 4D11-421·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

William Grant Sanders appeals the summary denial of his Motion for Court Transcripts at State Expense. We affirm. See Vanover v. State, 946 So.2d 1152, 1152 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (“ ‘Beyond the record provided for a direct appeal, [a prisoner] is not entitled to free transcripts to assist in the preparation of either a postconviction motion or a petition for extraordinary relief.’ ” (quoting Golden v. State, 870 So.2d 167, 167 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)); accord Meader v. State, 59 So.3d 1202 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

Affirmed.

HAZOURI, MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sanders v. State, 62 So. 3d 1176, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8068, 2011 WL 2135652 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

62 So. 3d 1176 (Sanders v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Enrique Vilomar v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2026
Milner v. State
196 So. 3d 569 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Pacheco v. State
75 So. 3d 769 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)