Pacheco v. State

75 So. 3d 769, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17779, 2011 WL 5375066
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 9, 2011
DocketNo. 3D11-2178
StatusPublished

This text of 75 So. 3d 769 (Pacheco v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pacheco v. State, 75 So. 3d 769, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17779, 2011 WL 5375066 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

ROTHENBERG, J.

Jose Antonio Pacheco (“Pacheco”) appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion for a copy of Sentencing Transcripts At State’s Expense. We affirm. See Sanders v. State, 62 So.3d 1176, 1176 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (“Beyond the record provided for a direct appeal, [a prisoner] is not entitled to free transcripts to assist in the preparation of either a postconviction motion or a petition for extraordinary relief.”) (quoting Golden v. State, 870 So.2d 167, 167 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)); accord Vanover v. State, 946 So.2d 1152, 1152 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); Ridge v. Adams, 643 So.2d 116, 117 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (holding that although prisoners are entitled to free copies and services for plenary appeal, there is no provision in law to obtain them thereafter).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Enrique Vilomar v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2026

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
75 So. 3d 769, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17779, 2011 WL 5375066, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pacheco-v-state-fladistctapp-2011.