Vanna White v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. David Deutsch Associates
This text of 989 F.2d 1512 (Vanna White v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. David Deutsch Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The panel has voted unanimously to deny the petition for rehearing. Circuit Judge Pregerson has voted to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc, and Circuit Judge Goodwin so recommends. Circuit Judge Alarcon has voted to accept the suggestion for rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc. An active judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed.R.App.P. 35.
The petition for rehearing is DENIED and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is REJECTED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
989 F.2d 1512, 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1933, 26 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1362, 93 Daily Journal DAR 3477, 21 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1330, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 4928, 1993 WL 73915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vanna-white-v-samsung-electronics-america-inc-david-deutsch-associates-ca9-1993.