Elsmere Music, Inc. v. National Broadcasting Company

623 F.2d 252, 207 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 277, 6 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1457, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 16820
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided June 9, 1980·No. 1180, Docket 80-7145·Published·Cited by 69 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This copyright infringement suit concerns a skit, shown on the television program “Saturday Night Live,” poking fun at New York City’s public relations campaign and its theme song. In the four-minute skit the town fathers of Sodom discuss a plan to improve their city’s image. The satire ends with the singing of “I Love Sodom” to the tune of “I Love New York.” The District Court for the Southern District of New York (Gerard L. Goettel, Judge) rejected appellant’s claim of copyright infringement, concluding that the parody was protected fair use. Believing that, in today’s world of often unrelieved solemnity, copyright law should be hospitable to the humor of parody, and that the District Court correctly applied the doctrine of fair use, we affirm on Judge Goettel’s thorough opinion. 1 482 F.Supp. 741.

1

. The District Court concluded, among other things, that the parody did not make more extensive use of appellant’s song than was necessary to “conjure up” the original. 482 F.Supp. at 747. While we agree with this conclusion, we note that the concept of “conjuring up” an original came into the copyright law not as a limitation on how much of an original may be used, but as a recognition that a parody frequently needs to be more than a fleeting evocation of an original in order to make its humorous point. Columbia Pictures Corp. v. National Broadcasting Co., 137 F.Supp. 348, 354 (S.D.Cal.1955). A parody is entitled at least to “conjure up” the original. Even more extensive use would still be fair use, provided the parody builds upon the original, using the original as a known element of modern culture and contributing something new for humorous effect or commentary.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Elsmere Music, Inc. v. National Broadcasting Company, 623 F.2d 252, 207 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 277, 6 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1457, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 16820 (2d Cir. 1980).

623 F.2d 252 (Elsmere Music, Inc. v. National Broadcasting Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Devin Copeland v. Justin Bieber
789 F.3d 484 (Fourth Circuit, 2015)
Tufamerica, Inc. v. WB Music Corp.
67 F. Supp. 3d 590 (S.D. New York, 2014)
Jackson v. Odenat
9 F. Supp. 3d 342 (S.D. New York, 2014)
Tufamerica, Inc. v. Diamond
968 F. Supp. 2d 588 (S.D. New York, 2013)
Burnett v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.
491 F. Supp. 2d 962 (C.D. California, 2007)
Jobete Music Co. v. Johnson Communications, Inc.
285 F. Supp. 2d 1077 (S.D. Ohio, 2003)
Suntrust Bank v. Houghton Mifflin Company
252 F.3d 1165 (Eleventh Circuit, 2001)
Suntrust Bank v. Houghton Mifflin Co.
136 F. Supp. 2d 1357 (N.D. Georgia, 2001)
Charles Atlas, Ltd. v. DC Comics, Inc.
112 F. Supp. 2d 330 (S.D. New York, 2000)
Lyons Partnership, L.P. v. Giannoulas
14 F. Supp. 2d 947 (N.D. Texas, 1998)
Annie Leibovitz v. Paramount Pictures Corporation
137 F.3d 109 (Second Circuit, 1998)
Leibovitz v. Paramount Pictures Corp.
948 F. Supp. 1214 (S.D. New York, 1996)
Cardtoons, L.C. v. Major League Baseball Players Ass'n
868 F. Supp. 1266 (N.D. Oklahoma, 1994)
Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.
510 U.S. 569 (Supreme Court, 1994)
Black Dog Tavern Co., Inc. v. Hall
823 F. Supp. 48 (D. Massachusetts, 1993)
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. v. Campbell
972 F.2d 1429 (Sixth Circuit, 1992)