Vandegrift Forwarding Co. v. United States

39 Cust. Ct. 621
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Vandegrift Forwarding Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 39 Cust. Ct. 114
United States Customs Court·Decided August 9, 1957·No. Reap. Dec. 8960; Entry No. 777281, etc.·Published

Opinion

Mollison, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, subject to the approval of the Court,
1. That the merchandise consists of marble slabs exported from the Federal Republic of West Germany.
2. That on or about the date of exportation of the merchandise the subject of the appeals enumerated above there was no foreign, export, or United States value for such or similar merchandise and that the costs of production for such merchandise were the invoice unit values stated in Deutsche marks plus the costs of packing as invoiced.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeals herein may be submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were the invoice unit values stated in deutschemarks, plus the costs of packing, as invoiced.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vandegrift Forwarding Co. v. United States, 39 Cust. Ct. 621 (cusc 1957).

39 Cust. Ct. 621 (Vandegrift Forwarding Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.