Vandegrift Forwarding Co. v. United States

38 Cust. Ct. 605

• Court: United States Customs Court
• Decided: March 15, 1957
• Docket: Reap. Dec. 8761; Entry No. 822688
• Status: Published

Opinion

LawrenCE, Judge:

The record indicates that, at the call of the calendar, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff when the above-enumerated appeal for a reappraisement was called for hearing, and the case was ordered submitted by the court.

Rule 5 (a) of the rules of the court provides that—

The submission for decision of any case shall be made in open court by the parties thereto or their attorneys, or by stipulation, or by written request to the court, or by the court on its own motion. Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or his attorney, in a case does not appear when the same is called, and after the opposite party has had opportunity to present evidence on the issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.

Accordingly, I have examined the record in the appeal before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper values of the merchandise are the values returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.