Vandegrift Forwarding Co. v. United States

37 Cust. Ct. 455
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedSeptember 19, 1956
DocketV. D. 37; Entry No. 805843
StatusPublished

This text of 37 Cust. Ct. 455 (Vandegrift Forwarding Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vandegrift Forwarding Co. v. United States, 37 Cust. Ct. 455 (cusc 1956).

Opinion

Wilson, Judge:

This matter is presently before me on a remand from a classification proceeding decided by the first division of this [456]*456court in Vandegrift Forwarding Co., Inc. v. United States, 35 Cust. Ct. 321, Abstract 59497. The judgment entered therein stated: “* * * that the matter be remanded to a single judge in reappraisement pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d).”

The matter has been submitted for decision upon an agreed statement of facts entered into by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto.

Upon the agreed facts, I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. §1402 (d)), to be the proper basis for determining the values of the involved merchandise and that such values are as follows:

Cost of binoculars each Cost of leather cases
Binoculars 7 x 50_ $15. 25 $1.35 Packed
Binoculars 8 x 30_ 12. 37 1.13 “

I further find such values to be the dutiable values of said merchandise.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vandegrift Forwarding Co. v. United States
35 Cust. Ct. 321 (U.S. Customs Court, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 Cust. Ct. 455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vandegrift-forwarding-co-v-united-states-cusc-1956.