Valiant v. Valiant

298 S.W.3d 588, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1733, 2009 WL 4639652
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 8, 2009·No. ED 92646·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*589 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Oliver Valiant (“Husband”) appeals the judgment finding, inter alia, Husband was in arrears on both his child support and maintenance obligations to Christina Valiant (“Wife”) and thus was in contempt of the orders awarding child support and maintenance to Wife, and ordering Husband to pay to Wife such arrearages, with interest, as well as Wife’s attorneys’ fees. We find the judgment was supported by substantial evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment of the trial court under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Valiant v. Valiant, 298 S.W.3d 588, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1733, 2009 WL 4639652 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

298 S.W.3d 588 (Valiant v. Valiant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Petty
298 S.W.3d 588 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)