Valiant v. Valiant

237 S.W.3d 236, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1333
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Valiant v. Valiant. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1733
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 18, 2007·No. No. ED 88978·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Husband, Tommy Valiant, appeals from a decree of dissolution of marriage. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the [237]*237parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Valiant v. Valiant, 237 S.W.3d 236, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1333 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

237 S.W.3d 236 (Valiant v. Valiant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murphy v. Carron
536 S.W.2d 30 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1976)