State v. Petty

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Petty

298 S.W.3d 588, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1705, 2009 WL 4639649

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 8, 2009·No. ED 91888·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Christopher Petty (“Defendant”) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Lincoln County convicting him of second-degree statutory rape. Defendant claims that the trial court erred in overruling his motion for judgment of acquittal. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that there was sufficient evidence at trial from which a reasonable juror could find Defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Christopher Petty (“Defendant”) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Lincoln County convicting him of second-degree statutory rape. Defendant claims that the trial court erred in overruling his motion for judgment of acquittal. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that there was sufficient evidence at trial from which a reasonable juror could find Defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Petty, 298 S.W.3d 588, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1705, 2009 WL 4639649 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

298 S.W.3d 588 (State v. Petty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related