Urdaneta v. Urdaneta

649 So. 2d 356, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 972, 1995 WL 46630
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 8, 1995·No. No. 93-3046·Published

Opinion

FARMER, Judge.

The former husband appeals an order of reference to a general master, over his timely objection, of the former wife’s motion for contempt for failure to pay alimony and his motion for modification. We reverse, as we have done previously, on the grounds that the trial court may not assign such matters to a master over the objection of a party. Prater v. Lehmbeck, 615 So.2d 760 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Colin v. Hinckley, 600 So.2d 58 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Hanor v. Hinckley, 584 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Taylor v. Taylor, 569 So.2d 1389 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

REVERSED.

HERSEY and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Urdaneta v. Urdaneta, 649 So. 2d 356, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 972, 1995 WL 46630 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

649 So. 2d 356 (Urdaneta v. Urdaneta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hanor v. Hinckley
584 So. 2d 1129 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Taylor v. Taylor
569 So. 2d 1389 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Colin v. Hinckley
600 So. 2d 58 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Prater v. Lehmbeck
615 So. 2d 760 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)