Urdaneta v. Urdaneta
This text of 649 So. 2d 356 (Urdaneta v. Urdaneta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The former husband appeals an order of reference to a general master, over his timely objection, of the former wife’s motion for contempt for failure to pay alimony and his motion for modification. We reverse, as we have done previously, on the grounds that the trial court may not assign such matters to a master over the objection of a party. Prater v. Lehmbeck, 615 So.2d 760 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Colin v. Hinckley, 600 So.2d 58 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Hanor v. Hinckley, 584 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Taylor v. Taylor, 569 So.2d 1389 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).
REVERSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
649 So. 2d 356, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 972, 1995 WL 46630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/urdaneta-v-urdaneta-fladistctapp-1995.