Taylor v. Taylor
This text of 569 So. 2d 1389 (Taylor v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Barry TAYLOR, Appellant,
v.
Gloria Juanita TAYLOR, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Barry Taylor, Fort Lauderdale, pro se.
Charles F. Lamm, Lauderhill, for appellee.
GARRETT, Judge.
We choose to treat this appeal as a petition for writ of mandamus and prohibition. Fla.R.App.P. 9.040(c). As such, we grant the petition on the authority of Slattery v. Slattery, 528 So.2d 1377 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988).
Appellant timely objected to the order which referred a motion to compel hearing to the general master. The trial judge overruled the objection.
A party's consent is required before the hearing can be referred to the general master. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.490(c).
Accordingly, we reverse the order of referral and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
HERSEY, C.J., and WARNER, J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
569 So. 2d 1389, 1990 WL 181850, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-taylor-fladistctapp-1990.