Lunger v. Hinckley
572 So. 2d 1042, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 360, 1991 WL 4324
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 23, 1991
DocketNo. 90-3040
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 572 So. 2d 1042 (Lunger v. Hinckley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lunger v. Hinckley, 572 So. 2d 1042, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 360, 1991 WL 4324 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
Opinion
We sua sponte strike Betty Lunger as a named respondent.
The respondent concedes error. We grant the petition for writ of mandamus and prohibition and quash the order of the trial court on the authority of Taylor v. Taylor, 569 So.2d 1389 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Murphy v. Murphy, 558 So.2d 532 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). See Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.490(c).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Swezy v. Bart-Swezy
866 So. 2d 1248 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
572 So. 2d 1042, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 360, 1991 WL 4324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lunger-v-hinckley-fladistctapp-1991.