Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Colin v. Hinckley

Colin v. Hinckley

600 So. 2d 58, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7825, 1992 WL 153980
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 8, 1992
DocketNo. 92-1184
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 600 So. 2d 58 (Colin v. Hinckley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Colin v. Hinckley, 600 So. 2d 58, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7825, 1992 WL 153980 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant the petition for a writ of mandamus. See Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.490(c); Hanor v. Hinckley, 584 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). Respondent Hinckley shall vacate the order of reference to the general master and shall promptly schedule a hearing before the court on all pending applications. We expressly disapprove of the practice, if it is a practice, of routinely assigning all such matters to a general master and then overruling any objection by a non-consenting party.

MANDAMUS GRANTED.

DELL and FARMER, JJ., concur. GUNTHER, J., concurring in result only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Urdaneta v. Urdaneta
649 So. 2d 356 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
600 So. 2d 58, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7825, 1992 WL 153980, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colin-v-hinckley-fladistctapp-1992.