Colin v. Hinckley

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Colin v. Hinckley

600 So. 2d 58, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7825, 1992 WL 153980

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 8, 1992·No. No. 92-1184·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant the petition for a writ of mandamus. See Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.490(c); Hanor v. Hinckley, 584 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). Respondent Hinckley shall vacate the order of reference to the general master and shall promptly schedule a hearing before the court on all pending applications. We expressly disapprove of the practice, if it is a practice, of routinely assigning all such matters to a general master and then overruling any objection by a non-consenting party.

MANDAMUS GRANTED.

DELL and FARMER, JJ., concur. GUNTHER, J., concurring in result only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We grant the petition for a writ of mandamus. See Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.490(c); Hanor v. Hinckley, 584 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). Respondent Hinckley shall vacate the order of reference to the general master and shall promptly schedule a hearing before the court on all pending applications. We expressly disapprove of the practice, if it is a practice, of routinely assigning all such matters to a general master and then overruling any objection by a non-consenting party.

MANDAMUS GRANTED.

DELL and FARMER, JJ., concur. GUNTHER, J., concurring in result only.

Colin v. Hinckley, 600 So. 2d 58, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7825, 1992 WL 153980 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

600 So. 2d 58 (Colin v. Hinckley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related