University of Incarnate Word and Christopher Carter v. Valerie Redus, Individually, and Robert M. Redus, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Robert Cameron Redus

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 10, 2015·No. 04-15-00120-CV·Published

Opinion

ACCEPTED 04-15-00120-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 8/10/2015 11:02:59 PM KEITH HOTTLE CLERK

NO. 04-15-00120-CV

FILED IN IN THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 8/10/2015 11:02:59 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk UNIVERSITY OF THE INCARNATE WORD, Defendant--Appellant v.

VALERIE REDUS, Individually, and ROBERT M. REDUS, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Cameron M. Redus Plaintiffs—Appellees _________________________________________________

On appeal from the 150th Judicial District Court of Bexar County, Texas

APPELLEES’ REPLY TO UIW’S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF AND SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS

Appellees Valerie and Robert M. (“Mickey”) Redus file their reply to UIW’s

Supplemental Brief and Supplemental Response to Motion to Dismiss pursuant to

Local Rule 8.3, but will request leave of Court if necessary.

UIW, in its Supplemental Brief, urges this Court to consider recently passed

Senate Bill 308 when determining whether UIW is a “governmental unit” for

purposes of the Texas Tort Claims Act. The bill, which becomes effective on

September 1, 2015, makes a private university’s campus police department a “law

enforcement agency and a governmental body” for purposes of complying with

Tex. Govt. Code § 552, commonly known as the Texas Public Information Act. This act, as this Court knows, guarantees access to “public information”

gathered by a “governmental body,” but excepts information held by a “law

enforcement agency” that deals with the detection, investigation, or prosecution of

crime. See, e.g., Tex. Govt. Code §§ 552.002, 021 and 108.

UIW properly does not consider itself bound by the Senate Bill 308 until it

becomes effective next month. When a local television station submitted a request

for UIW’s Use of Force Policies and Procedures, UIW declined to respond:

Thank you for your request. As you know the Texas Public Information Act is applicable to a “governmental body” as defined in the Texas Government Code. The Texas legislature has passed a bill making clear that a private university’s police department is a “law enforcement agency” and “a governmental body” under the Government Code “only with respect to information relating solely to law enforcement activities” with an effective date of September 1, 2015. This legislation, coupled with the recent Supreme Court ruling in favor of Rice University, clarify that private university police departments authorized and approved by the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement are entitled to the same immunities that public university police departments receive. Therefore, please resubmit your request for consideration on or after September 1, 2015.

Exhibit 1 (Statement from UIW dated June 5, 2015).

UIW’s statement is correct as to its duty to comply with the Public

Information Act. Beginning in September, the Campus Police Department will

have to respond to requests made under the act. The law regarding the “powers,

privileges, and immunities” accorded campus police at private universities will not

otherwise change. See Tex. Educ. Code § 51.212.

UIW’s statement is less correct with regard to the law governing immunity.

The Supreme Court established in William Marsh Rice v. Refaey, 459 S.W.3d 590, 2 595 (Tex. 2015) that private university police officers are entitled to interlocutory

appeals—under Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 51.014(a)(5)—of denials of motions

for summary judgment based on an officer’s assertion of immunity. At the same

time, the Supreme Court confirmed that private universities are not government

agencies under § 51.014: “no applicable statute treats Rice University or its police

force like a state agency….” Id. at 593 (distinguishing the Court’s holding in Klein

v. Hernandez, 315 S.W.3d 1 (Tex.2010)).

Senate Bill 308 may affect how UIW responds to Texas Public Information

Act requests after September 1, 2015, but it has no impact on the law applicable to

the Reduses’ claims, to their Motion to Dismiss this appeal, or to UIW’s claim to

be a “governmental unit” when Campus Police Officer Christopher Carter shot

Cameron Redus on December 6, 2013. Those questions are settled by the law in

effect when the underlying suit was filed. See Robinson v. Crown Cork & Seal Co.,

Inc., 335 S.W.3d 126, 149 (Tex. 2010) (holding that statute passed after suit was

filed which limited defendant’s liability violated the Texas Constitution prohibition

against retroactive laws).

FOR THESE REASONS, appellees Valerie and Robert M. Redus again ask

this Court to dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction or, in the alternative,

deny the plea to the jurisdiction and remand this action to the trial court for

further proceedings.

3 Respectfully submitted,

BURFORD PERRY, LLP

____________________ BRENT C. PERRY STATE BAR NO. 15799650 700 LOUISIANA, SUITE 4545 HOUSTON, TX 77002 TEL: (713) 401-9790 FAX: (713) 993-7739 BPERRY@BURFORDPERRY.COM

HERRING LAW FIRM

S/MASON W. HERRING MASON W. HERRING STATE BAR NO. 24071746 SUITE 1150 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77019 (832) 500-3170 – TELEPHONE (832) 500-3172 – FACSIMILE MHERRING@HERRINGLAWFIRM.COM

THE HERRERA LAW FIRM

S/JORGE A. HERRERA FRANK HERRERA, JR. STATE BAR NO. 09531000 FHERRERA@HERRERALAW.COM JORGE A. HERRERA STATE BAR NO. 24044242 JHERRERA@HERRERALAW.COM 111 SOLEDAD, SUITE 1900 SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78205 TEL: 210.224.1054 FAX: 210.228.0887

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEES 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Reply has been served on the following counsel of record by electronic service in accordance with Tex. R. App. P. 9.5(e), on August 10, 2015.

Laurence S. Kurth Matthew Wymer Beirne, Maynard & Parsons, LLP 112 East Pecan St., Suite 2750 San Antonio, TX 78205 Counsel for Defendant UIW

Robert A. Valadez Shelton & Valadez 600 Navarro St., Suite 500 San Antonio, TX 78205 Counsel for Defendant Christopher Carter

____________________ BRENT C. PERRY

5 APPELLEES'

exhibitsticker.com EXHIBIT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

University of Incarnate Word and Christopher Carter v. Valerie Redus, Individually, and Robert M. Redus, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Robert Cameron Redus, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

University of Incarnate Word and Christopher Carter v. Valerie Redus, Individually, and Robert M. Redus, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Robert Cameron Redus (University of Incarnate Word and Christopher Carter v. Valerie Redus, Individually, and Robert M. Redus, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Robert Cameron Redus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related