University of Incarnate Word and Christopher Carter v. Valerie Redus, Individually, and Robert M. Redus, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Robert Cameron Redus

Opinion

ACCEPTED 04-15-00120-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 6/4/2015 2:39:35 PM KEITH HOTTLE CLERK

NO. 04-15-00120-CV ______________________________________________________ FILED IN IN THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS 6/4/2015 2:39:35 PM ______________________________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk UNIVERSITY OF THE INCARNATE WORD, Defendant – Appellant,

V.

VALERIE REDUS, ET AL., Plaintiffs – Appellees. ______________________________________________________

APPEAL FROM 150TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS ______________________________________________________

APPELLANT’S OPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF AND SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS ______________________________________________________

Laurence S. Kurth BEIRNE, MAYNARD & PARSONS, L.L.P. State Bar No. 11768450 112 East Pecan Street, Suite 2750 San Antonio, TX 78205 Matthew F. Wymer (210) 582-0220 - Telephone State Bar No. 24005234 (210) 582-0231 – Facsimile E-mail – lkurth@bmpllp.com E-mail – mwymer@bmpllp.com

Attorneys for Defendant/Appellant University of the Incarnate Word TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

COMES NOW, Appellant the University of the Incarnate Word (“UIW”)

and files this Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Brief and Supplemental

Response to Motion to Dismiss. In support thereof, UIW would show the Court

the following:

FACTS AND ARGUMENT

On June 1, 2015, Texas Governor Greg Abbott signed into law changes to

the provisions of Education Code which are at issue in the instant case.

Specifically, effective September 1, 2015, Section 51.212 of the Education Code

will be amended to expressly state, “A Campus Police Department of a private

institution of higher education is a law enforcement agency and a

governmental body” for purposes of the Texas Public Information Act (Chapter

552 of the Government Code). See Tex. S.B. 308, 84th Leg., R.S. (2015)

(emphasis added); see attachment to Supplement.

The legislature further removed the caveat to campus police immunity that

their actions must be “consistent with the educational mission of the institution.”

See Tex. S.B. 308, 84th Leg., R.S. (2015); see attachment to Supplement.

These changes have a direct impact on this case, and lend substantial support

to UIW’s position in the instant litigation.

The supplemental briefing is six (6) pages long.

1 Accordingly, UIW respectfully moves the Court to Grant this Motion for

Leave and file the attached (Exhibit A) Supplemental Brief and Supplamental

Response to Motion to Dismiss.

The undersigned conferred with opposing counsel on June 4, 2015, wherein

opposing counsel stated that he was OPPOSED to any supplemental briefing.

PRAYER

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, for these reasons, UIW

respectfully moves the Honorable Court of Appeals to Grant this Motion for Leave

and allow the filing of the attached Supplemental Brief and Supplemental

Response to Motion to Dismiss, and further prays for such other legal and

equitable relief to which Appellant may be entitled.

2 Respectfully submitted,

BEIRNE, MAYNARD & PARSONS, L.L.P. The Weston Centre 112 East Pecan Street, Suite 2750 San Antonio, TX 78205 (210) 582-0220 - Telephone (210) 582-0231 – Facsimile

By: /s/ Matthew F. Wymer Laurence S. Kurth State Bar No. 11768450 E-mail – lkurth@bmpllp.com Matthew F. Wymer State Bar No. 24005234 E-mail – mwymer@bmpllp.com

ATTORNEYS FOR RELATOR THE UNIVERSITY OF THE INCARNATE WORD

3 CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

The undersigned conferred with opposing counsel on June 4, 2015, wherein

opposing counsel stated that he was OPPOSED to any supplemental briefing.

/s/ Matthew F. Wymer Matthew F. Wymer

Dated: June 4, 2015

4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been forwarded to the following counsel of record in accordance with the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure this 4th day of June, 2015:

Brent C. Perry Law Office of Brent C. Perry, PC 800 Commerce Street Houston, Texas 77002 brentperry@brentperrylaw.com

Mason W. Herring Herring Law Firm 4640 Banning Drive Houston, Texas 77027 mherring@herringlawfirm.com

Jorge Herrera Herrera Law Firm 111 Soledad, Suite 1900 San Antonio, Texas 78205 jherrera@herreralaw.com

Robert A. Valadez Javier T. Duran Shelton & Valadez 600 Navarro Street, Suite 500 San Antonio, Texas 78205 rvaladez@shelton-valadez.com and jduran@shelton-valadez.com

/s/ Matthew F. Wymer Matthew F. Wymer

2182610v.1 005538/107036 5 EXHIBIT A NO. 04-15-00120-CV ______________________________________________________

IN THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS ______________________________________________________

UNIVERSITY OF THE INCARNATE WORD, Defendant – Appellant,

V.

VALERIE REDUS, ET AL., Plaintiffs – Appellees. ______________________________________________________

APPEAL FROM 150TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS ______________________________________________________

APPELLANT’S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF AND SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS ______________________________________________________

Laurence S. Kurth BEIRNE, MAYNARD & PARSONS, L.L.P. State Bar No. 11768450 112 East Pecan Street, Suite 2750 San Antonio, TX 78205 Matthew F. Wymer (210) 582-0220 - Telephone State Bar No. 24005234 (210) 582-0231 – Facsimile E-mail – lkurth@bmpllp.com E-mail – mwymer@bmpllp.com

Attorneys for Defendant/Appellant University of the Incarnate Word

ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED TABLE OF CONTENTS

INDEX OF AUTHORITIES..................................................................................... ii

SUPPLEMENTAL ARGUMENT .............................................................................2

A. The Education Code now expressly states, “A Campus Police Department of a private institution of higher education is a law enforcement agency and a governmental body” for purposes of the TPIA; the legislature removed the caveat to campus police immunity that their actions must be “consistent with the educational mission of the institution.”.................2

PRAYER ....................................................................................................................6

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ..................................................................................8

i INDEX OF AUTHORITIES

CASES

LTTS Charter Sch., Inc. v. C2 Constr., Inc., 342 S.W.3d 73, 78 (Tex. 2011) ..........................................................................4, 5

STATUTES

TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 101.001-.109..........................................................6

TEX. CRIM. PROC. CODE ART. 2.13(A) ........................................................................3

TEX. CRIM. PROC. CODE ART. 14.03 ...........................................................................3

TEX. EDUC. CODE § 51.212 ........................................................................................2

TEX. GOV’T CODE § 552.002......................................................................................4

TEX. GOV’T CODE § 552.108......................................................................................4

TEX. S.B. 308, 84TH LEG., R.S. (2015)...................................................................... 3

TORT CLAIMS ACT SECTION 101.001(3)(D)................................................................4

ii NO. 04-15-00120-CV ______________________________________________________

IN THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS ______________________________________________________

UNIVERSITY OF THE INCARNATE WORD, Defendant – Appellant,

V.

VALERIE REDUS, ET AL., Plaintiffs – Appellees. ______________________________________________________

APPEAL FROM 150TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS ______________________________________________________

APPELLANT’S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF AND SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS ______________________________________________________

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

Appellant, University of the Incarnate Word (“UIW”), Defendant in the

underlying cause of action, respectfully files this supplemental briefing to advise the

Court of a change in Texas law that is highly relevant to Appellant’s Interlocutory

Appeal and the Motion to Dismiss filed by Appellee. In support thereof, UIW would

show this Court:

1 SUPPLEMENTAL ARGUMENT

A. The Education Code now expressly states, “A Campus Police Department of a private institution of higher education is a law enforcement agency and a governmental body” for purposes of the TPIA; the legislature removed the caveat to campus police immunity that their actions must be “consistent with the educational mission of the institution.”

On June 1, 2015, Texas Governor Greg Abbott signed into law changes to the

provisions of Education Code which are at issue in the instant case. Specifically,

effective September 1, 2015, Section 51.212 of the Education Code will be amended as

follows:

(b) Any officer commissioned under the provisions of this section is vested with all the powers, privileges, and immunities of peace officers if the officer: (1) is on the property under the control and jurisdiction of the respective private institution of higher education or is otherwise performing duties assigned to the officer by the institution, regardless of whether the officer is on property under the control and jurisdiction of the institution, but provided these duties are consistent with the educational mission of the institution and are being performed within a county in which the institution has land; or (2) to the extent authorized by Section 51.2125, is: (A) requested by another law enforcement agency to provide assistance in enforcing state or local law, including a municipal ordinance, and is acting in response to that request; or (B) otherwise assisting another law enforcement agency in enforcing a law described by Paragraph (A).

2 [(F) A CAMPUS POLICE DEPARTMENT OF A PRIVATE INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION IS A LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY AND A GOVERNMENTAL BODY FOR PURPOSES OF CHAPTER 552, GOVERNMENT CODE, ONLY WITH RESPECT TO INFORMATION RELATING SOLELY TO LAW ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES.]

See attached Tex. S.B. 308, 84th Leg., R.S. (2015) (emphasis added).

While it is instructive that the Legislature removed the requirement to the private

univerity Peace Officer’s immunity that their duties be “consistent with the educational

mission of the institution,” this provision raises no issues in this case because Cpl.

Carter, a licensed and commissioned Texas Peace Officer at the time of the incident

that is the basis of this suit observed a highly intoxicated Redus operating a motor

vehicle on a public road between UIW campus buildings. It is well briefed in UIW’s

filings before this Court that Carter acted within his authority and obligations under

Texas law. See TEX. CRIM. PROC. CODE ART. 2.13(a); TEX. CRIM. PROC. CODE ART.

14.03.

Chapter 552 of the Government Code is the Texas Public Information Act

(“TPIA”). The statute clearly establishes the UIW Police Department as a

“Governmental Body” relating to its law enforcement activities:

In this chapter, “public information” means information that is written, produced, collected, assembled, or maintained under a law or ordinance or in connection with the transaction of official business:

3 (1) by a governmental body;

(2) for a governmental body and the governmental body:

(A) owns the information; (B) has a right of access to the information; or (C) spends or contributes public money for the purpose of writing, producing, collecting, assembling, or maintaining the information; or

(3) by an individual officer or employee of a governmental body in the officer’s or employee’s official capacity and the information pertains to official business of the governmental body.

TEX. GOV’T CODE § 552.002(emphasis added).

The added Section F to Section 51.212 of the Education Code is highly

germaine to the instant case. The Texas Supreme Court in LTTS Charter Sch., Inc. v.

C2 Constr., Inc., 342 S.W.3d 73, 78 (Tex. 2011) expressly relied on similar provisions

in the Education Code which applied to private open-enrollment charter schools to find

they were a “governmental unit” as defined in Section 101.001(3)(D) of the Tort

Claims Act:

Chapter 12 further subjects open-enrollment charter schools to a host of statutes that govern governmental entities outside the Education Code …. for purposes of the Government Code’s and Local Government Code’s regulation of government records, “an open-enrollment charter school is considered to be a local government” and its records “are government records for all purposes under state law.”37 And lastly, under Section 12.1053, as noted above, an open-enrollment charter school is considered to be: (1) a “governmental entity” for purposes of Government Code and Local Government Code

4 provisions relating to property held in trust and competitive bidding; (2) a “political [12] subdivision” for purposes of Government Code provisions on procurement of professional services; and (3) a “local government” for purposes of Government Code provisions on authorized investments.38

In sum, numerous provisions of Texas law confer “status” upon and grant “authority” to open-enrollment charter schools. Their status as “part of the public school system of this state”39 —and their authority to wield “the powers granted to [traditional public] schools”40 and to receive and spend state tax dollars41 (and in many ways to function as a governmental entity42 )—derive wholly from the comprehensive statutory regime described above. With this legislative backdrop in mind, we are confident that the Legislature considers Universal Academy to be an “institution, agency, or organ of government” under the Tort Claims Act43 and thus entitled to take an interlocutory appeal here.44

LTTS Charter Sch., Inc., 342 S.W.3d at 78(emphasis added).

As a “law enforcement agency” under the TPIA, the UIW Police Department

will be “excepted” from disclosure of certain documents under specific circumstances,

including, but not limited to instances where the “release of the information would

interfere with the detection, investigation, or prosecution of crime.” TEX. GOV’T CODE

§ 552.108.

UIW’s Police Department is a “law enforcement agency” which is part of the

law enforcement network of the State of Texas, with the same authority, obligations,

duties, responsibilities and immunities as any other law enforcement agency or police

department in the State. Accordingly, the Legislature has now clarified this issue and

expressly stated campus police departments like the UIW Police Department are a “law

5 enforcement agency and a governmental body,” and therefore, this Court should find

UIW is a “Governmental Unit” under the Texas Tort Claims Act, entitled to

governmental immunity. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE §§ 101.001–.109

(“‘Governmental unit’ means … any other institution, agency, or organ of government

the status and authority of which are derived from … laws passed by the legislature

under the constitution.”).

PRAYER

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant UIW respectfully asks

the Court to Grant its Plea to the Jurisdiction and Motion to Dismiss, and dismiss all

claims and causes of action pleaded by Plaintiffs against UIW and Cpl. Carter and for

such other legal and equitable relief to which Appellant may be entitled.

6 Respectfully submitted,

BEIRNE, MAYNARD & PARSONS, L.L.P. The Weston Centre 112 East Pecan Street, Suite 2750 San Antonio, TX 78205 (210) 582-0220 - Telephone 210) 582-0231 – Facsimile

By: /s/ Laurence S. Kurth Laurence S. Kurth State Bar No. 11768450 E-mail – lkurth@bmpllp.com Matthew F. Wymer State Bar No. 24005234 E-mail – mwymer@bmpllp.com

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT THE UNIVERSITY OF THE INCARNATE WORD

7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been forwarded to the following counsel of record in accordance with the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure this 4th day of June, 2015:

Brent C. Perry Law Office of Brent C. Perry, PC 800 Commerce Street Houston, TX 77002 brentperry@brentperrylaw.com

Mason W. Herring Herring Law Firm 4640 Banning Drive Houston, TX 77027 mherring@herringlawfirm.com

Jorge Herrera Herrera Law Firm 111 Soledad, Suite 1900 San Antonio, TX 78205 jherrera@herreralaw.com

Robert A. Valadez Javier T. Duran Shelton & Valadez 600 Navarro Street, Suite 500 San Antonio, TX 78205 rvaladez@shelton-valadez.com jduran@shelton-valadez.com

/s/ Laurence S. Kurth Laurence S. Kurth

8 TEX. S.B. 308, 84TH LEG., R.S. (2015)

9 2015 Bill Text TX S.B. 308 Enacted, June 1, 2015

Reporter 2015 Bill Text TX S.B. 308

Notice

Added: Text highlighted in green Deleted: Red text with a strikethrough

THE STATE OF TEXAS BILL TEXT > TEXAS 84TH LEGISLATURE > SENATE BILL 308

Synopsis AN ACT relating to the powers and duties of campus police departments at private institutions of higher education.

Text BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: SECTION 1. Section 51.212, Education Code, is amended by amending Subsection (b) and adding Subsection (f) to read as follows: (b) Any officer commissioned under the provisions of this section is vested with all the powers, privileges, and immunities of peace officers if the officer: (1) is on the property under the control and jurisdiction of the respective private institution of higher education or is otherwise performing duties assigned to the officer by the institution, regardless of whether the officer is on property under the control and jurisdiction of the institution, but provided these duties are consistent with the educational mission of the institution and are being performed within a county in which the institution has land; or (2) to the extent authorized by Section 51.2125, is: (A) requested by another law enforcement agency to provide assistance in enforcing state or local law, including a municipal ordinance, and is acting in response to that request; or (B) otherwise assisting another law enforcement agency in enforcing a law described by Paragraph (A). (F) A CAMPUS POLICE DEPARTMENT OF A PRIVATE INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION IS A LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY AND Page 2 of 2 2015 Bill Text TX S.B. 308

A GOVERNMENTAL BODY FOR PURPOSES OF CHAPTER 552, GOVERNMENT CODE, ONLY WITH RESPECT TO INFORMATION RELATING SOLELY TO LAW ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES. SECTION 2. This Act takes effect September 1, 2015.

History

S.B. NO. 308

Sponsor(s)

Whitmire

Classification

Subject: COLLEGES & UNIVERSITIES (92%); SCHOOL SAFETY & SECURITY (92%); POLICE FORCES (92%); LEGISLATORS (92%); LAW ENFORCEMENT (91%); EDUCATION SYSTEMS & INSTITUTIONS (90%); LEGISLATION (78%); ORDINANCES (73%)

Load-Date: June 3, 2015 THE STATE OF TEXAS BILL TEXT Copyright ©2015 LexisNexis. All rights reserved.