United States v. Young

19 C.M.A. 481, 19 USCMA 481, 42 C.M.R. 83, 1970 CMA LEXIS 838, 1970 WL 6991
United States Court of Military Appeals·Decided June 5, 1970·No. No. 22,677·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinions

Opinion of the Court

Darden, Judge:

The appellant pleaded guilty to an unauthorized absence that began May 17, 1969. A record of Article 15 nonjudicial punishment for a two and one-half hour unauthorized absence was used against Young for sentencing purposes. This evidence was inadmissible on an offense that occurred before August 1, 1969. United States v Johnson, 19 USCMA 464, 42 CMR 66 (1970). Since similar prosecution exhibits show special court-martial convictions for other such absences, the chance of harm is remote. The decision of the Court of Military Review is therefore affirmed.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Young, 19 C.M.A. 481, 19 USCMA 481, 42 C.M.R. 83, 1970 CMA LEXIS 838, 1970 WL 6991 (cma 1970).

19 C.M.A. 481 (United States v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Dukes
5 M.J. 71 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1978)
United States v. Scott
21 C.M.A. 154 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1972)
United States v. Baker
20 C.M.A. 175 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1970)
United States v. Montgomery
20 C.M.A. 35 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1970)
United States v. Haney
19 C.M.A. 527 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1970)
United States v. Holder
19 C.M.A. 528 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1970)
United States v. Lindsay
19 C.M.A. 502 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1970)