United States v. Holder

19 C.M.A. 528, 19 USCMA 528, 42 C.M.R. 130, 1970 CMA LEXIS 818, 1970 WL 7020
United States Court of Military Appeals·Decided July 2, 1970·No. No. 22,962·Published

Opinions

Opinion of the Court

Darden, Judge:

The appellant pleaded guilty to larceny committed on or about July 30, 1969. Error in the introduction of seven instances of non judicial punishment is made harmless, however, by the showing of court-martial convictions for failing to go to his appointed place of duty (three specifications), absence without leave, use of disrespectful language to a noncommissioned officer, failure to obey a lawful order (two specifications), and communicating a threat to kill. United States v Johnson, 19 USCMA 464, 42 CMR 66 (1970), and United States v Young, 19 USCMA 481, 42 CMR 83 (1970).

The decision of the Court of Military Review is affirmed.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Holder, 19 C.M.A. 528, 19 USCMA 528, 42 C.M.R. 130, 1970 CMA LEXIS 818, 1970 WL 7020 (cma 1970).

19 C.M.A. 528 (United States v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Johnson
19 C.M.A. 464 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1970)
United States v. Young
19 C.M.A. 481 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1970)