United States v. Young
This text of United States v. Young (United States v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6172
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MARK GREGORY YOUNG,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:97-cr-00288-CCB-l)
Submitted: February 26, 2009 Decided: March 3, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mark Gregory Young, Appellant Pro Se. Bonnie S. Greenberg, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Mark Gregory Young appeals the district court’s order
denying his petition for adjustment of supervised release.
Because Young was unconditionally released on August 26, 2008,
with no term of supervised release, we dismiss the appeal as
moot. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Young, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-young-ca4-2009.