United States v. Young

294 F. App'x 34
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 23, 2008·No. 08-7016·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Nathan Young appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for modification or deferment of his fine. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Young, No. 7:04-cr-00050-F-l (E.D.N.C. May 28, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Young, 294 F. App'x 34 (4th Cir. 2008).

294 F. App'x 34 (United States v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.