United States v. Young

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 3, 2009·No. 08-6172·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6172

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MARK GREGORY YOUNG,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:97-cr-00288-CCB-l)

Submitted: February 26, 2009 Decided: March 3, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark Gregory Young, Appellant Pro Se. Bonnie S. Greenberg, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Mark Gregory Young appeals the district court’s order

denying his petition for adjustment of supervised release.

Because Young was unconditionally released on August 26, 2008,

with no term of supervised release, we dismiss the appeal as

moot. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Young, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Young (United States v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.