United States v. Woodson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Woodson. Read the opinion of the Court — 422 F. App'x 295
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 24, 2009·No. 09-6121·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6121

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ROBERT C. WOODSON, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:96-cr-00370-1)

Submitted: March 17, 2009 Decided: March 24, 2009

Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert C. Woodson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Leslie Bonner McClendon, Edmund P. Power, Assistant United States Attorneys, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Robert C. Woodson, Jr., appeals the district court’s

order granting his motion for reduction of sentence under 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v.

Woodson, No. 1:96-cr-00370-1 (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 5 & entered

Jan. 7, 2009); see United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 257

(4th Cir. 2009) (“[A] district judge is not authorized to reduce

a defendant’s sentence below the amended guideline range.”). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Woodson, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Woodson (United States v. Woodson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Dunphy
551 F.3d 247 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)