United States v. Woodson

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Woodson

199 F. App'x 200

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 7, 2006·No. 05-7273·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Robert C. Woodson, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders denying his petition for writ of error coram nobis and his subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Woodson, No. CR-96-370 (E.D. Va. filed May 31, 2005 & entered June 1, 2005; filed June 27, 2005 & entered June 28, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Robert C. Woodson, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders denying his petition for writ of error coram nobis and his subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Woodson, No. CR-96-370 (E.D. Va. filed May 31, 2005 & entered June 1, 2005; filed June 27, 2005 & entered June 28, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Woodson, 199 F. App'x 200 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

199 F. App'x 200 (United States v. Woodson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.