United States v. Woodberry

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Woodberry. Read the opinion of the Court — 423 F. App'x 325
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 23, 2011·No. 10-7580·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7580

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CHRISTOPHER RAPHAEL WOODBERRY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:02-cr-00040-TLW-1)

Submitted: February 10, 2011 Decided: February 23, 2011

Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Raphael Woodberry, Appellant Pro Se. Rose Mary Sheppard Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Christopher Raphael Woodberry appeals the district

court’s order denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Woodberry, No. 4:02-cr-00040-TLW-1

(D.S.C. Oct. 26, 2010). We deny Woodberry’s motion to expedite.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Woodberry, (4th Cir. 2011).

United States v. Woodberry (United States v. Woodberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.