United States v. Woodberry
This text of United States v. Woodberry (United States v. Woodberry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7580
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CHRISTOPHER RAPHAEL WOODBERRY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:02-cr-00040-TLW-1)
Submitted: February 10, 2011 Decided: February 23, 2011
Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher Raphael Woodberry, Appellant Pro Se. Rose Mary Sheppard Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Christopher Raphael Woodberry appeals the district
court’s order denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Woodberry, No. 4:02-cr-00040-TLW-1
(D.S.C. Oct. 26, 2010). We deny Woodberry’s motion to expedite.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Woodberry, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-woodberry-ca4-2011.