United States v. Woodberry

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Woodberry

423 F. App'x 325

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 23, 2011·No. No. 10-7580·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[326]*326Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Raphael Woodberry appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Woodberry, No. 4:02-cr-00040-TLW-1 (D.S.C. Oct. 26, 2010). We deny Woodberry’s motion to expedite. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[326]*326Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Raphael Woodberry appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Woodberry, No. 4:02-cr-00040-TLW-1 (D.S.C. Oct. 26, 2010). We deny Woodberry’s motion to expedite. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Woodberry, 423 F. App'x 325 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

423 F. App'x 325 (United States v. Woodberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related