United States v. Woodberry
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6234
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CHRISTOPHER RAPHAEL WOODBERRY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:02-cr-00040-TLW-1)
Submitted: April 22, 2010 Decided: April 28, 2010
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher Raphael Woodberry, Appellant Pro Se. Rose Mary Sheppard Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Christopher Raphael Woodberry appeals the district
court’s order denying his motion for specific performance of the
plea agreement in his underlying criminal conviction. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Woodberry, No. 4:02-cr-00040-TLW-1 (D.S.C. Jan. 27,
2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Woodberry (United States v. Woodberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.