United States v. Woodberry

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Woodberry. Read the opinion of the Court — 423 F. App'x 325
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 28, 2010·No. 10-6234·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6234

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CHRISTOPHER RAPHAEL WOODBERRY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:02-cr-00040-TLW-1)

Submitted: April 22, 2010 Decided: April 28, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Raphael Woodberry, Appellant Pro Se. Rose Mary Sheppard Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Christopher Raphael Woodberry appeals the district

court’s order denying his motion for specific performance of the

plea agreement in his underlying criminal conviction. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Woodberry, No. 4:02-cr-00040-TLW-1 (D.S.C. Jan. 27,

2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Woodberry, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Woodberry (United States v. Woodberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.