United States v. Winston
This text of United States v. Winston (United States v. Winston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7533
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LEVI H. WINSTON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (3:91-cr-00189-2)
Submitted: February 20, 2009 Decided: March 11, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Levi H. Winston, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Levi H. Winston appeals the district court’s order
denying Winston’s motion for reconsideration of the order
finding him ineligible for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. United States v. Winston, No.
3:91-cr-00189-2 (S.D. W. Va. July 17, 2008). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Winston, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-winston-ca4-2009.