United States v. Winston
Opinion
Monte Deearlos Winston appeals the district court’s order granting his request to forward a letter to Winston’s attorney, in which Winston sought a copy of the court’s 2003 order denying his pre-trial motions to suppress evidence and to dismiss the indictment. Because the district court granted the requested relief, and Winston ultimately received a copy of the order from his attorney, we affirm. * United States v. Winston, No. 3:99-cr-00030-REP (E.D.Va. Mar. 3, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
202 F. App'x 613 (United States v. Winston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.