United States v. Wilson
This text of United States v. Wilson (United States v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-40946 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ROBERT EARL WILSON, Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:01-CR-6-ALL -------------------- April 11, 2002
Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Robert
Earl Wilson on appeal has moved for leave to withdraw and has
filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967). Wilson has filed a response. Our independent review
of counsel’s brief, Wilson’s response, and the record discloses
no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Wilson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-wilson-ca5-2002.