FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 131

Rules of procedure and evidence; power to prescribe

28 U.S.C. § 2072
Title28Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter131 — RULES OF COURTS

This text of 28 U.S.C. § 2072 (Rules of procedure and evidence; power to prescribe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 2072.

Text

(a)The Supreme Court shall have the power to prescribe general rules of practice and procedure and rules of evidence for cases in the United States district courts (including proceedings before magistrate judges thereof) and courts of appeals.
(b)Such rules shall not abridge, enlarge or modify any substantive right. All laws in conflict with such rules shall be of no further force or effect after such rules have taken effect.
(c)Such rules may define when a ruling of a district court is final for the purposes of appeal under section 1291 of this title.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeo
577 U.S. 442 (Supreme Court, 2016)
943 case citations
Combs v. Nick Garin Trucking
825 F.2d 437 (D.C. Circuit, 1987)
141 case citations
Edward Orlett v. Cincinnati Microwave, Inc., James L. Jaeger
954 F.2d 414 (Sixth Circuit, 1992)
110 case citations
Sims v. Great American Life Insurance
469 F.3d 870 (Tenth Circuit, 2006)
105 case citations
Zurich Insurance Company v. Logitrans, Inc.
297 F.3d 528 (Sixth Circuit, 2002)
84 case citations
Steiner v. 20th Century-Fox Film Corp.
232 F.2d 190 (Ninth Circuit, 1956)
71 case citations
Bendix Aviation Corp. v. Glass
195 F.2d 267 (Third Circuit, 1952)
64 case citations
In Re Sealed Case
494 F.3d 139 (D.C. Circuit, 2007)
40 case citations
Gary Bryant v. Ford Motor Co.
832 F.2d 1080 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)
39 case citations
Arthur J. Fulcher, Jr. v. United States
632 F.2d 278 (Fourth Circuit, 1980)
36 case citations
Kramer v. Jenkins
108 F.R.D. 429 (N.D. Illinois, 1985)
35 case citations
Douglass v. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki
46 F.4th 226 (Fifth Circuit, 2022)
29 case citations
McDOUGALL v. ELIUK
554 N.W.2d 56 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1996)
26 case citations
Jackson v. Crosby
375 F.3d 1291 (Eleventh Circuit, 2004)
21 case citations
Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Monarch Leasing Co.
84 F.3d 204 (Sixth Circuit, 1996)
18 case citations
United States v. Goodall, Rodney
236 F.3d 700 (D.C. Circuit, 2001)
17 case citations

Source Credit

History

(Added Pub. L. 100–702, title IV, §401(a), Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4648; amended Pub. L. 101–650, title III, §§315, 321, Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5115, 5117.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Prior Provisions
A prior section 2072, acts June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 961; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §103, 63 Stat. 104; July 18, 1949, ch. 343, §2, 63 Stat. 446; May 10, 1950, ch. 174, §2, 64 Stat. 158; July 7, 1958, Pub. L. 85–508, §12(m), 72 Stat. 348; Nov. 6, 1966, Pub. L. 89–773, §1, 80 Stat. 1323, authorized the Supreme Court to prescribe rules of civil procedure, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 100–702, §§401(a), 407, effective Dec. 1, 1988.

Amendments
1990—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 101–650 added subsec. (c).

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Change of Name
Words "magistrate judges" substituted for "magistrates" in subsec. (a) pursuant to section 321 of Pub. L. 101–650, set out as a note under section 631 of this title.

Effective Date
Section effective Dec. 1, 1988, see section 407 of Pub. L. 100–702, set out as an Effective Date of 1988 Amendment note under section 2071 of this title.

Applicability to Virgin Islands
Rules of civil procedure promulgated under this section as applicable to the District Court of the Virgin Islands, see section 1615 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.

Court Rules

Admiralty Rules
The Rules of Practice in Admiralty and Maritime Cases, promulgated by the Supreme Court on Dec. 20, 1920, effective Mar. 7, 1921, as revised, amended, and supplemented, were rescinded, effective July 1, 1966, in accordance with the general unification of civil and admiralty procedure which became effective July 1, 1966. Provision for certain distinctly maritime remedies were preserved however, in the Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims, Rules A to F, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Appendix to this title. The Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims were subsequently renamed the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 2072, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/2072.