United States v. Wilson

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: January 28, 2010
• Docket: 09-7892
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7892

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RODNEY WILSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (4:03-cr-70134-nkm-mfu-3)

Submitted: January 19, 2010 Decided: January 28, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rodney Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Rodney Wilson appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for a reduction of sentence filed pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying

the motion. See United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th

Cir. 2004) (motion under § 3582(c) “is subject to the discretion

of the district court”); United States v. Legree, 205 F.3d 724,

727 (4th Cir. 2000). Thus, we affirm the district court’s order

for the reasons stated there. See United States v. Wilson, No.

4:03-cr-70134-nkm-mfu-3 (W.D. Va. Sept. 24, 2009). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED