United States v. Wilson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6977

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

GREG LEO WILSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CR-96-41, CA-99-10)

Submitted: August 9, 2001 Decided: August 17, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Greg Leo Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Greg Leo Wilson seeks to appeal the district court’s order de-

nying his Rule 60(b) motion of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

seeking relief from the court’s denial of his motion filed under 28

U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and

the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accord-

ingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States

v. Wilson, Nos. CR-96-41; CA-99-10 (W.D. Va. May 17, 2001). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED