United States v. Wilson

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 12, 1999·No. 98-7469·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7469

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

GEORGE WILSON, a/k/a Fat George, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CR-95-198, CA-98-2-6)

Submitted: December 29, 1998 Decided: January 12, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

George Wilson seeks to appeal the district court’s order de-

nying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea- soning of the district court. See United States v. Wilson, Nos. CR-95-198; CA-98-2-6 (E.D. Va. Sept. 10, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Wilson, (4th Cir. 1999).

United States v. Wilson (United States v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related