United States v. Wilson
This text of United States v. Wilson (United States v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7469
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
GEORGE WILSON, a/k/a Fat George,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CR-95-198, CA-98-2-6)
Submitted: December 29, 1998 Decided: January 12, 1999
Before MURNAGHAN, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
George Wilson seeks to appeal the district court’s order de-
nying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West
1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-
soning of the district court. See United States v. Wilson, Nos.
CR-95-198; CA-98-2-6 (E.D. Va. Sept. 10, 1998). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Wilson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-wilson-ca4-1999.