United States v. Wilson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Wilson. Read the opinion of the Court — 135 F.3d 291
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 19, 1999·No. 99-6344·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6344

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WILLIAM DAVID WILSON, a/k/a Pudgie,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Fayetteville. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CR-94-65-BO, CA-98-551-5-BO)

Submitted: May 13, 1999 Decided: May 19, 1999

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William David Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

William David Wilson seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994

& Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-

soning of the district court. See United States v. Wilson, Nos.

CR-94-65-BO; CA-98-551-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 21, 1999). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Wilson, (4th Cir. 1999).

United States v. Wilson (United States v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related