United States v. Williams

79 F. App'x 654
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 264 F.3d 561
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 6, 2003·No. 03-30444·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Defendant-Appellant Darryl L. Williams appeals his conviction and sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm. See 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). Williams contends on appeal that the district court abused its discretion in denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Because the district court properly advised him of the maximum possible penalty for the offense of conviction, however, Williams cannot prevail on his argument that his reliance on misinformation from both prosecution and defense counsel about the likely period of incarceration rendered the plea involuntary. United States v. Gracia, 983 F.2d 625, 629 (5th Cir.1993); see also Fed. R.Crim. P. 11(d)(2).

The record indicates that Williams knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal his sentence. See United States v. Portillo, 18 F.3d 290, 292-93 (5th Cir. 1994). As a result, Williams waived his arguments that the district court erred in overruling his objection to the PSR and by applying the cross-reference of § 2K2.1(c).

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Williams, 79 F. App'x 654 (5th Cir. 2003).

79 F. App'x 654 (United States v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Eduardo Gracia
983 F.2d 625 (Fifth Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Nicholas Arthur Portillo
18 F.3d 290 (Fifth Circuit, 1994)