United States v. Williams

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 24, 2001·No. 00-20802·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-20802 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ERIN WILLIAMS,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-262-2 -------------------- May 23, 2001

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Mark Bennet, appointed to represent Erin Williams, has moved

to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Williams has received a copy of

counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the brief and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Williams, (5th Cir. 2001).

United States v. Williams (United States v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)