United States v. Williams

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 120 F.3d 575
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 4, 1999·No. 98-11493·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-11493 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DARAL WAYNE WILLIAMS,

Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:98-CR-34-1 __________________________________________

July 30, 1999

Before KING, Chief Judge, HIGGINBOTHAM and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Daral Wayne Williams, the Federal Public Defender, has filed

a motion to withdraw and supporting brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967). Williams has not filed a response. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the

record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Williams, (5th Cir. 1999).

United States v. Williams (United States v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)