United States v. Williams

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 20 F.3d 125
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 27, 1997·No. 96-40441·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40441 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DERRICK MARKEIST WILLIAMS,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:95-CR-36-41 - - - - - - - - - - February 14, 1997

Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Derrick Markeist Williams appeals his guilty-plea conviction

for using or carrying a firearm in relation to a drug trafficking

crime in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1). Williams argues

that there is no factual basis for the plea in light of the

Supreme Court’s decision in Bailey v. United States, 116 S. Ct.

501 (1995).

Assuming that the Bailey decision renders the facts adduced

at the plea hearing insufficient to support Williams’s “use” of

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 96-40441 - 2 -

the firearm, we conclude that sufficient facts were adduced to

support Williams’s “carrying” of the firearm in violation of the

statute. See United States v. Rivas, 85 F.3d 193, 195 (5th

Cir.), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 593 (1996). The judgment of the

district court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Williams, (5th Cir. 1997).

United States v. Williams (United States v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bailey v. United States
516 U.S. 137 (Supreme Court, 1995)
United States v. Oscar Orlando Rivas
85 F.3d 193 (Fifth Circuit, 1996)