United States v. Williams

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 264 F.3d 561
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 21, 2003·No. 03-40422·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 22, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-40422 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CRAIG T. WILLIAMS,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:02-CR-108-1 --------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Craig T.

Williams on appeal has requested leave to withdraw and has filed

a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Williams has not filed a response. Our independent review of the

record and the brief discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.

Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 03-40422 -2-

MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Williams, (5th Cir. 2003).

United States v. Williams (United States v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)